Composing human anatomy paragraphs

The human body associated with essay is where you completely develop your argument. Each human body paragraph should contain one idea that is key claim, which can be supported by appropriate examples and evidence through the human anatomy of scholarly focus on your subject (in other words. educational books and journal articles).

Together, the human anatomy paragraphs form the building blocks of the argument.

How do you plan paragraphs?

The TEEL structure offers an effective method of organising a paragraph. TEEL represents Topic phrase, Explanation, proof, and Link. You might believe it is useful to include C for Comment before Link. A paragraph organized this real way would retain the following:

  • Topic sentence – the sentence that is first a human anatomy paragraph that tells your reader just exactly what the key concept or claim regarding the paragraph may be.
  • Explanation – Explain what you suggest in more detail.
  • Proof – Provide proof to guide your claim or idea. For this, relate to your research. This might consist of: situation studies, statistics, documentary evidence, scholastic books or log articles. Keep in mind that all proof will demand citation that is appropriate.
  • Comment – Consider the skills and limitations regarding the proof and examples which you have actually presented. Explain how your proof supports your claim (for example. so how exactly does it ‘prove’ your topic phrase?).
  • Link – Summarise the idea that is main of paragraph, while making clear just how this paragraph supports your general argument.

Example paragraph

One of the most significant obstacles to reaching consensus that is international climate modification action could be the ongoing debate over which nations should shoulder the duty. As the developed world has historically been accountable for nearly all greenhouse gasoline emissions, it was argued they should allow reduce emissions and developed nations to prioritise development over environmental issues (Vinuales, 2011). The thought of ‘common but differentiated responsibility’ (CBDR) ended up being formalised into the UN Framework Convention on Climate improvement in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 (UNFCCC, 1992). Article 3.1 clearly states ‘Accordingly, the developed country Parties should make the lead in fighting weather modification and also the undesirable results thereof’ (p. 4). But, because CBDR describes a principle rather than an actionable plan it has remained problematic. For instance, it will not stipulate the degree to which, underneath the concept of CBDR, developing countries ought to be exempt from certain emissions goals. It has always been a true point of contention in worldwide negotiations on weather change, with developed nations for instance the United States Of America arguing that developed nations needs to do more to cut back emissions (Klein et. al., 2017). Fairness and equity must be pursued in reaching an agreement that is global weather modification, but transforming this into an actionable strategy is problematic.

Legend: Topic sentence ; Explanation ; Evidence / Example ; Comment ; Link


The paragraph below had been written in reaction to the essay concern: ‘”Leaders are designed in place of created.” Would you concur or disagree? Offer reasons behind your viewpoint.’

See the paragraph then reply the relevant question that follows.